spEPDnew, the Schizosaccharomyces pombe (fission yeast) curated promoter database
Promoter Selection and Analysis tools
  Various tools allow you to analyse promoters from EPD and/or to
  select subsets of promoters. In order to analyze the complete EPD
  promoter set, go directly to one of the analysis pages. If you
  prefer to first select a subset of promoters, go to one of the
  selection pages. From the output of the selection pages you can then
  directly navigate to one of the analyses pages, or you can continue
  with another selection page to refine your promoter selection.
  
    
      Selection tools
	
	  - 
	    EPD
	    selection tool: Promoter subset selection based on
	    EPD-supplied annotation.
	  
 
	  - 
	  ChIP-Cor: Promoter subset selection based on
	  experimental data or genome annotations residing in the MGA
	  repository. Example: select promoters that have more than
	  100 H3K4me3 ChIP-seq tags data between -100 and +100
	  relative to the TSS.
	  
 
	  - 
	  FindM: Promoter subset selection based on DNA motif
	  occurrences.  Example: select promoters that have (or do not have)
          a c-Myc binding site between -100 and +100 relative to
	  the TSS.
	  
 
	 
     | 
    
    
      Analysis tools
	
	  - 
	    
	      ChIP-Cor
	    
	    : Generation of an aggregation plot (feature
	    correlation plot) for a specific chromatin of genome
	    annotation features. Example: Distribution of nucleosomes
	    (MNase-seq tags) near promoters,
	    
	      e.g.  from -1000 to +1000 relative to the TSS.
	    
	  
 
	  - 
	    
	      ChIP-Extract : Extraction of
	      specific chromatin features around each promoter in
	      table format. The output is a table with rows
	      representing each promoter and columns the feature
	      tag occurrence at a specific distance. Example:
	      Distribution of nucleosomes (MNase-seq tags) near
	      each promoter, e.g.  from -1000 to +1000 relative
	      to the TSS. Useful for downstream analysis in R,
	      for example to classify promoters according to
	      differences in feature distribution.
	  
 
	  - 
	    
	      OProf
	    
	    : Generate a motif occurrence profile around
	    TSS positions. Example: Generate a plot showing the
	    occurrence frequency of TATA boxes between -100 to +100
	    relative to the TSS.
	  
 
	  - 
	    
	      FindM
	    
	    : Extract DNA motif positions near transcription start
	    sites.  Example: extract coordinates of CCAAT boxes
	    located between -150 and -50 relative to a TSS. The output
	    is a set of CCAAT-box positions that can be further analyzed
	    in the same way as a set of TSS positions.
	  
 
	 
       | 
    
    
      | 
      How-To Documentation: 
      OProf, 
      FindM and 
      ChIP-Cor.
       | 
    
  
Database quality control
Core promoter elements' enrichment
  Core promoter element analysis is performed in order to investigate
  the quality of the promoter collection. It leverages the preferential
  occurrence of certain DNA motifs at characteristic distances from the
  TSS. For instance, TATA boxes occur in a narrow region
  centered about 28 bp upstream of the TSS, whereas the CCAAT box
  occurs in a much wider area, with a maximal frequency at position
  -80. Based on these observations, a high-quality promoter collection
  is expected to show high peaks for both motifs. In addition, a narrow
  TATA box peak at -28 would indicate precise TSS mapping. This analysis
  has been performed using
  OProf. EPD users are
  encouraged to repeat this analysis and to perform others in order to
  check the quality of the promoter list.
  
  
  RefSeq (Sept-2015)
Li et al., 2015;Thodberg et al., 2018;EPD (old)
chrI%3A504532-508532
SPAC227.04_1;SPAC227.05_1;SPAC227.06_1
TATA-box:
  this core promoter element is normally found 28 bp upstream the
  transcription start site. The following plot shows that EPDnew
  promoter collection has a more focused TATA-box distribution
  compared to RefSeq annotation suggesting a precise TSS mapping in
  EPDnew.
Initiator: it is found at the TSS and shows a great enrichment in EPDnew compared to RefSeq promoter collection.